That barely anyone with an organic brain would use any those phrases as a heading, much less all of them.
replyThis article isn't particularly egregious but AI does come up with really cringy headings. Most often "the <irrelevant noun>" over and over.
The current frontier models also have a bizarre tendency to prepend said headings with weirdly irrelevant emoji. I really wonder where they picked that up.
replyIt was a very prominent trend in frontend and hip JavaScript repositories on GitHub before AI
replyHmm... I think this could be a case of the organic brain soaking up LLM-isms by the way as it is using these tools intensively. As much as I don't like robot writing, this all seems overly paranoid to me.
replyDo no try to look at the individual examples, look at the overall style of headings.
It's about style, people say such things, they are not unique.
replyThe point is not that no one says these IRL, the point is that LLMs always tend to fall back on this kind of verbiage - they got it from us, they aren’t doing anything new or special, they’re just predisposed towards a very particular kind of voice / word choice in prose.
replyI will echo the flagged comment in spirit:
replyThose are wild headings that read like an op-ed on a site covered in ads. I've said some of those things irl, and "relief pitcher" is a thing, and in solution those phrases are fine. As section headings it's wild imo
I think we’re talking about the obvious AI tells that apparently only some of us can see.
replyVersus some of us look at five tells and say “nah, this is fine in isolation” over and over.