Ok, buddy.
replyI can’t host GLM 5.3 yet, so my agents still run on 5.2. But the fact that 5.2 is sufficient and there’s another gen in the wings kinda proves my point, imo.
[flagged]
replyI don't think everything has to be Thought Leadership. OP compared the same generation of models to show that the latest open model—at the time of the latest closed model—was Good Enough.
replyI agree that the opener to their reply wasn't productive, but neither is "Weak."
I think it’s a fine response when you say, “Doesn't feel well informed enough to give advice,” because I said 5.2
replyIdk man, but an engineer would've taken that and said something like: "Damn, yeah, good point, I shall add a sentence mentioning 5.3"
replyBecause an engineer feels secure in their knowledge so that such an oversight doesn't make them suddenly defend their identity - it's just an oversight after all. Happens.
5.3 isn't available as open weights yet, and only became available via API three days ago. Prior to that the only way to access it was via a Z.ai subscription.
reply> Yes, weights aren't out yet, but neither are the ones of Fable.
replyGranted, edited in by me, but definitely before you - another thought leader - arrived.
he did already tell on himself btw. No point in this charade.
FWIW you’re not looking good in this engagement, feels very childish, looking for a gotcha that doesn’t mean much
replyI think that depends on the audience. Thank you for caring though :)
replyAudience member here: I agree with GP; you posts come off as petty and childish.
replyIt seems natural to me to make comparisons only to open weight models where the weights have actually been released.
Why would you also burn your reputation for this?
replyWeird.