upvote
Another thing that may blow the minds of some is that M87* is less dense than air at 0.44kg/m³ so if you could bring it to sea level (in a large enough theoretical test area) it would float like a helium balloon (sea level air is 1.2kg/m³).

Of course if you did do that, the air itself would collapse into a black hole larger than M87*...

reply
Consider the magnetar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar

"A magnetar's 10^10 tesla field, by contrast, has an energy density of 4.0×1025 J/m3, with an E/c2 mass density more than 10,000 times that of lead."

reply
Yes, magnetars are considerably more rare than black holes and considerably more interesting to study in terms of raw horsepower. Imagine a type-2 civilization using them as engines or launchers for spacecraft to zip around the galaxy.
reply
the radiation from a magnetar exceeds any other star, overcoming that would seem implausible

still trying to wrap my mind around kilonovas (colliding neutron stars)

ie. they can pop out earth-sized chunks of gold, in theory, and since they aren't black holes that would be VISIBLE, albeit also "in theory" lol

* https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/unfolding-story-of-kilono...

maybe Roman can spot one someday, that would be something

reply
> they can pop out earth-sized chunks of gold

The can produce Earth masses of gold, but of course not in the form of "chunks". The gold starts as atoms in a highly ionized gas and only much later cools enough to form solids (dust).

reply
It blows my mind that, in the frame of an outside observer, time appears to stop at the event horizon. An observer falling through the horizon (who survived the radiation and tidal forces) would not perceive this.
reply
Assuming they do fall through it. Remember they're about to receive an entire universe lifetime's stellar radiation compressed into a microsecond.

(Which is another reason some people think we might be living inside a black hole. An entire universe of energy released in zero time is literally a Big Bang. It would form into stars and galaxies.)

reply
> densest objects before black holes

Not quite, I think a (theoretical) quark star would be higher density?

reply
>what's really going to blow your mind is while you probably assumed or knew spinning black holes move space around them spinning black holes also move TIME around them

Well, isn't called space-time for nothing. You can't have one without the other. Like in electromagnetism. I thought it was kinda obvious since Einstein and Minkowsky.

reply