upvote
I don't think anyone was making money on nitter instances anyway, I don't see much in the way of any "brand" or business to lose... and lose to who? Not like there's a competitor. This is just a side project not worth playing games with IMO.

I wouldn't consider temporarily disabling a side project "razing the project to the ground" either.

> no one wants to use you

How do you know this was ever a project goal? Most FOSS projects I talk to have no interest in actively trying to gain more users on purpose.

reply
I was having a generic conversation about the risks to continue service, when handed a C&D, prior to reasonable assessment time. And my point was? There is none.

This helps to give optics into what to do, when served a plate of absurdity.

And if this C&D is caved to, then so will future ones, and Nitter won't have any use anyhow.

reply
Most of the C&D cases I've heard about on HN, have been against small open source projects that absolutely don't have the legal resources to fight it, and I'm sure the ones sending that letter know it. I suspect that companies are much more likely to send a C&D to an individual or small community than to a company with a legal team.
reply
> And if this C&D is caved to, then so will future ones, and Nitter won't have any use anyhow.

I don't agree with any of that but ok. It's not like they can stop instances in other countries they have no jurisdiction over, so I don't think its "use" will suddenly vanish.

reply