upvote
If the large studies are to be believed, you could save hundreds of thousands of lives and many billions in excess expenditure, because stable blood glucose shortens length of stay. People with diabetes alone account for 60% of hospital expenditure, so improving their care improves the system in a big way.
reply
>People with diabetes alone account for 60% of hospital expenditure

That number seemed too large to be true, and I think you might be conflating some numbers...

The NIH study about Economic Costs of Diabetes in the US in 2022 [1] states:

>For cost categories analyzed, care for people diagnosed with diabetes accounts for 1 in 4 health care dollars in the U.S., 61% of which are attributable to diabetes.

So, 25% of health care (not hospital) dollars in the US are apportioned to people with diabetes, and in 61% of those cases, the cause is directly attributable to diabetes itself.

Similarly, an NHS study [2] revealed that 60% of overall diabetes spend goes towards diabetes-related complications.

Finally, this presentation [3] states that: "hospital stays involving patients with diabetes contributed almost $83 billion or 23% of the total hospitalization costs in the United States," and, of course, not all of those were directly diabetes-related.

Obviously that is still a staggering amount of money spent on diabetes every year, and represents a huge burden on our healthcare system. But 60% for all hospital expenditure just doesn't track from my cursory Google-ing here.

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37909353/

[2] https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about-us/news-and-views/cost-com...

[3] https://www.bu.edu/csmet/2020/08/04/healthcare-data-analytic...

reply
Wild numbers. I already thought GLPs were huge but this makes me think it’s even larger.
reply
deleted
reply
oof, that's what I get for commenting late! I was thinking of that 23% number.
reply
In fairness, that’s still massive.
reply