it’s a cut and dry constitutional amendment, it doesn’t matter if Thomas thinks the people that were in mind when it was drafted are not the same people it applies to now. if they want to change it, go ahead and get the states to ratify a new amendment.
replySupreme Court doesn’t get to throw out an amendment because it’s old.
It's also amusing that you won't ever hear conservatives like Thomas making the same argument when it comes to, say, the 2nd amendment.
replyNo one should be subjected to a Thomas dissent. Especially that one.
replydeleted
replyWhat is this "lever" you claim already existed and then got "removed", precisely?
reply