Doesn't the incentive here, lead to privatizing the AI and possibly releasing a different product to the public - or at least with a delay? (not too unlike how the frontier labs work today).
replyYes I would think that would be the endgame goal. But in practice, I’m very skeptical a purely AI-driven executor can stay competitive when the market and government supporting it and surrounding it is driven by humans
replyYou’re presuming here that CEOs cause companies to make profit instead of serving as a scapegoat for their often unavoidable market dynamics (at best).
replyIn a 1-person company, who or what generates a profit?
replyOne person isn't a company. Legally maybe, but there's no point in a company if you can profitably do all the labor yourself.
replyAt what point does a company become a company if one person doesn’t make a company? What’s the threshold for non-labor where a company becomes a company?
replyYou're describing the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall[1], which, I'm sorry, is a Marxist idea so it's automatically wrong.
reply1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendency_of_the_rate_of_profit...
deleted
reply