upvote
>Insane scaling of bloat, bugs, and technical debt I'd say.

You just described every legacy codebase. Many of which are widely used and do a lot of sales. You dont need a clean codebase to have a valuable product.

>It is so crazy that this is being touted as a sane strategy.

Re-read what I said. I literally called it crazy.

It is the same dynamic that gave us customer service from some call center in India. Why would companies do this? Customer service got worse. Are they stupid? No, it's just worth it. The quality goes down but the business can scale more so it doesnt matter.

AI will absolutely be good enough at doing things that we'll happily accept some jankiness at times so that we can devote an extra 3000 hours per year per person to other things.

Im not even suggesting its a good thing. I just think the incentive structure dictates it. You're not going to have time to maintain a small slice of some service by hand.

reply
I think all code is technical debt in a way. Good code is a necessary evil, bad code is more evil than necessary.

Generating code automatically when you're not even quite sure what it is or even should be doing is insanity.

reply
I'm not so sure LLM code today is below average. There was a time that things posted to dailywtf were normal everyday stuff
reply
Sorry, no, they wouldn't have been WTF's if they were normal
reply
You shared a story of a novice incompetent human programmer and this should tell us that AI is bad at coding.
reply