It’s possible this could go before multiple judges who won’t all agree with this particular one.
replyYeah but this was supposedly "Cut and dry" and no one familiar with the law could possibly mistake it, and it was all media manipulation that made it seem like there was a case where there wasnt one.
replyIt's also possible the Trump admin has people commenting online.
replyThey don't need to be part of the administration.
replyMore than 50% of voters voted for Trump. Even today >30% (of everyone) think he's doing a good job. (Ie about equal to the voters in absolute number terms). Lots of people believe eat he is doing is legal simply because he is doing it.
Well it is. They literally made a law saying whatever the president does is legal because he's the president.
reply> More than 50% of voters voted for Trump.
replyOnly 49.8% voted for Trump in the 2024 US election.
You can hear the Department of War's pov on this controversy from the All-In Podcast here:
replyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzwRflcLPAA&t=2479s
Super interesting pov from the person who recommended the supply risk designation.