If you want to dunk on sam for "it's too dangerous to publish GPT-3", you hardly need the release of gpt-3 to prove your point. All the other open model releases already provide pretty good evidence. Moreover the fact that the model wasn't release hardly points to the fact that he wanted to save face or whatever. Most AI labs don't release their old proprietary models, so the fact that gpt-3 wasn't released tells us very little.

Wasn't the whole point of not releasing because they wanted to normalize the process/concerns for future actually dangerous releases?

I think the release of kimi k3 is definitely arguably dangerous, we're already seeing consequences of elite-tier cyberoffense capabilities.

Thank you, I couldn't have said that in a better way.