You are right. Maybe the wording is a little too absolute. If you gotta ship and later try to slowly address any shortcomings in different areas, this is also a step in the right direction in my opinion. Just don't completely forget about those areas just because you have already shipped by that point.
reply> We gotta make trade-offs
replyYou could compromise on not-shipping-before-it's-ready.
Or even the original premise of agile, which was to iterate on it. But "iterate" these days means "onwards to the next feature that we'll only drive to MVP", not, "polish & fix bugs" or … do things like enhanced UI for power users.
replyNot if you have a deadline.
replythis is absolutely not true since December 2025.
the amount of "nice to have" items I've been commanding LLM to develop is a dream come true.
replywhile being better at QAing i finally get the time to work on the things that got me into programming in the first place, which in the point where human interact with the machine.