upvote
Judging by the lowercase “m” it’s the 8x16 variation[1] and not the 9x16 one you linked, but otherwise yes, looks like the plain old VGA font? (Incorrectly displayed, as the site points out: the VGA didn’t have square pixels in either of those modes.) The site uses (AVIF) images in place of text, but it’s like 15 minutes to write a program that typesets an ASCII file in a given monospace bitmap font and writes out the result as say a PPM (and I’m sure ImageMagick can do it if you’d rather dig through docs than program), so this doesn’t seem to require any further explanation?

[1] https://int10h.org/oldschool-pc-fonts/fontlist/font?ibm_vga_...

reply
Funny tidbit: "missile" used to be an adjective, "a missile weapon" = "a weapon than can be sent/thrown".

Same with cereals, "cereal" was an adjective that meant "relative to the goddess Ceres" then "relative to bread/wheat". "Cereal plants" -> cereals.

It's called "nominalization (or substantivization) by ellipsis".

reply
I think you meant "spelt" rather than spent. A but ironic, all things considered.
reply
Now I'm wondering if you meant to use but instead of bit intentionally or not... I'm not great with subtle humor in writing.
reply
Muphry's law, innit
reply
oh ironny
reply
I think you menat to spell "irony"
reply
And there I was wondering about used missiles!

Apparently, I googled, “expended ordnance” is the term.

reply
I did, yes. A but ironic indeed.
reply
[dead]
reply
> learned that "missiles" are not spent "missles"

I choose to believe that the author was channeling the spirit of Noah Webster as a deliberate champion of phonetic spelling reform.

reply
Or Andrew Jackson approaching the problem from the other end.

“It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.”

As a rather, well... "creative" speller I blame Webster for locking things down and ruining it for the rest of us.

reply
I few years ago I saw a TV interview where some gen-z kid confidently stated: "the dictdionary is supposed to reflect how I talk, not the other was around."
reply
The tricky part is that spoken language and written language are not the same. Even if you are a descriptionist that believes dictionaries should represent how people write, it doesn't necessarily mean that the spelling changes based on how people pronounce it.
reply
That's actually how many of the dictionary people see themselves.
reply
Also known as descriptivism. That's what it do.
reply
That is in fact what the dictionary is supposed to do.
reply
A natural descriptivist.
reply
And are British, at least in Australia (and the US, I guess?) we pronounce the second "i".

It is always fun when you notice where someone is from based on secondary clues like that -- my favourite is the choice of "a" or "an" where it is ambiguous (for instance, I recently ran across "an HTTP request" where I would've said "a HTTP request").

reply
I'd argue that "le" is not really phonetic to how people pronounce words ending in that; "missils" would be more phonetic
reply
> I'd argue that "le" is not really phonetic to how people pronounce words ending in that

Sorry? How do you think people pronounce words such as truffle / turtle / tremble / pickle / maple / rubble / etc. etc. etc.?

reply
Should be missels then?
reply
Let's settle the argument by all agreeing on mussels instead, and enjoy a nice seafood dish with garlic and a white wine sauce. Delicious.
reply
They're where they keep the nuclear wessels.
reply