has any browser ever made that work? Opera has to be the most popular by a mile and even they couldn't keep that business model going
replyNot in my knowledge. It would be hard to have the same amount of funding as they have now from Google.
replyWhat exactly is the problem? I understand a browser is a complex program but is the claim it is impossible to build a browser without continual dependence on advertising toxic dollars?
reply> a browser is a complex program
replyA browser in the class of Firefox or Chrome is for all intents and purposes a full OS constantly exposed to the world.
I understand open source OS development to be sustainable thanks to the the effort put into the server farms. That doesn't work for client side software, with the additional hurdle of needing to be better than the ad funded browser.
Orion (by Kagi) is still new, but seems to be trying.
replyPeople just expect browsers to be free. And there's no way that can be more than Google money.
replyThat's because browsers should be free. They are infrastructure, just like bridges. And nobody wants a bridge troll sitting on the single bridge crossing the internet river, demanding money from everyone.
replyYou pay for bridges with tax. Tax funded browser sounds good in theory, but I don't trust the people managing my tax money to run a tech project like Firefox. Most likely it gets handed to the lowest private sector bidder, with the stipulation that any privacy preserving — sorry, I meant criminal hiding — features be removed.
replyBridges are not free
replyI mean, bridge tolls are absolutely a thing.
replyMy area has roads w/o bridges that have a toll.
replyIf only we could open source it and load it onto the phone with Sideloadly.
reply... if only their donation links would let you specify your donation goes to Firefox development and no other mozilla service ...
reply