upvote
One of the best heuristics I've seen on whether there will be a fruitful outcome in taking someone seriously is how often they invoke labels (name calling, etc).

Hasn't failed - both in real life and online.

reply
On the contrary, it has just failed.
reply
[flagged]
reply
Even if Zitron is hopelessly wrong and a complete fool, he's an engaging writer. Like the original article itself states, it's not about the numbers, it's about catharsis. The transparent absence of AI tells in his articles is refreshing, and just rampaging against the AI boosters who lack empathy and self-awareness (which so many of them absolutely do) is cathartic. Even if it's all bunk, fake, and stupid, it's nice to have a way to self-soothe and manifest how much some of us want AI to have a reckoning.

Does that make his readers suckers? Possibly. But personally I also think it's a very human trait to seek comfort.

reply
This sounds incredibly neurotic and more than a little cultish. How long until Zitron starts a nice little AI-free settlement in Guyana?
reply
Right, you're very much his target audience.
reply
[flagged]
reply
I don't follow.
reply
You said "Right, you're very much his target audience."

I read that as a bit of a snarky jibe.

You implied you weren't his target audience so asked if you're on the other side of it - deep in AI psychosis.

reply
I don't think "not being Ed Zitron's target audience" works as a useful definition of AI psychosis.
reply
If you find derision and extreme cynicism "soothing", the problem may be with you, rather than those who are optimistic about AI.
reply
Life is more serene in psychosis, am I right?
reply