upvote

points

by Schnitz5 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby conmod27829 minutes ago|
next
[-]
People think all AI is bad. AI in the hands of expert can create wonders. Take a look below.

Oneiric | AI Sci-Fi Short Film | Higgsfield Originals (2026)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAg9iDh9_BQ

AI is replacing me by kold

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGoFUxCmBdA

reply
upvoteby f3408fh4 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Yep, it's super useless. The label is so general. Was AI used for one image in the 10 minute video? Is the voiceover AI? Is the entirety of it generated with AI? No way to know.
reply
upvoteby AmazingEveryDay3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Agreed. I think instead of "AI or not", that something more nuanced is needed - perhaps a rating system inspired by the MPAA's (g, pg, pg-13 r, nc-17, x) that is used for movies.
reply
upvoteby arcfour3 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Yeah, I make song remixes in the style of a particular video game and while the music is completely human written (by me), I'll often have AI generated or edit the "cover art" for me so people have something to look at/chuckle at.

These videos are still marked as AI, and fairly so; however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(

reply
upvoteby PixelForg1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(

Sorry but no, even if the music is great I don't want to hear it if the cover was AI generated, at this point I'd happily accept even a crudely drawn cover because it is human :)

reply
upvoteby arcfour2 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
What's the difference between me pasting a face over a body in GIMP manually and me prompting an LLM to make the same edit, faster, and better than I would by hand? They aren't particularly high-effort. The artwork isn't really the point, but I can't just upload a black video...
reply
upvoteby tadfisher5 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Now that the AI label exists, the creators using AI for an intro graphic or background music are probably going to stop using it.
reply
upvoteby Muskwalker3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
For a creator posting a video, Google gives specific guidelines on whether to tag it as AI:

"Was AI used to generate or edit your content in any of the following ways?

- Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t say or do

- Alters footage of a real event or place

- Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur

To follow YouTube’s policy, you’re required to tell us about your use of AI. This includes realistic sounds or visuals made or edited with AI. [View examples](https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491)"

So oddly an intro graphic only has to be tagged as AI if it shows a real/realistic person, place, or event, but (per the examples page) apparently any AI-generated music counts.

reply
upvoteby masteranza29 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
If so, that’s indeed a real concern...
reply
upvoteby altairprime1 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Google’s been pushing creators to use AI thumbnails more heavily since right around the EU deadline for labeling, presumably in the hopes of saturating the label so that everyone burns out and eats their slop quietly.
reply