Yeah this would be a great point if it were true and they didn’t give Mythos access to companies to fix bugs, which they did and have.
replyIt’s genuinely a difficult question. Not black and white. The models are really good at finding bugs, as demonstrated by people using Fable to reverse engineer. People make it sound like he’s just making it up.
I'm the guy you replied to, apologies for using a different account I'm away from my computer now.
replyThe distinction to me is that Anthropic gives access to that model but doesn't give control. They reserve the right to cut you off if they don't like what you are doing and require you allow data retention for Fable and Mythos to ensure your are not up to any skullduggery.
Meta, Alibaba, Mistral, even OpenAI has released models users can run locally and fully control. That is a whole world of difference.
They gave access, but considering that they wouldn't even sign the "don't ban open weights" letter, it's clear they would prefer to have tight control over who they bless with that access.
replyThey gave a few of the largest companies access to mythos.
replyHalf a year later, it is still not available to everyone else.
This would be more convincing if mythos was something uniquely special and not something merely a couple months ahead of everyone else. It was great marketing though.
replyDario's "ethical" look is also kinda sus. I hate to use ad hominem, but the dude's wife literally pitched a porn film to Epstein even after he was a convicted registered sex offender [1]. Dario is also really sinophobic (it is commonly claimed in Chinese AI circles that his former employment at Baidu triggered him so much that he harbors a personal grudge against the entire race).
reply[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2026/08/14/who-is-...
Pretty much. That's even worse imho.
reply