Over and over and over and over again it has been shown that there is no meaningful voter fraud whatsoever. Stop watching Fox News or as I see below reading yahoo news lol
replySaying a thing over and over doesn't make it true. Put differently, a lie repeated often enough is not therefore the truth. If you want to go believe in lies, fine, that is your prerogative. If you want to doubt one source, ten sources, or a thousand, nobody can stop you there either. Nonetheless, the truth will remain.
replyDo you hear yourself?
reply> Saying a thing over and over doesn't make it true.
replyEven saying it once doesn't make it true. Apply that to everything you have said.
Right, except voter fraud is a true thing. That you don't know that isn't my problem as such, but it will become one for the entire country because of people like you.
replyWhy are you lying about what the other person said? They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.
replyAmen my white brother. When is senior hour at the buffet? You know how we get in our age
replyWhite, black, yellow, red, or brown. 10 or 90. The truth remains.
replyYour vague handwavey manner of writing sounds very presidential.
replyIt's actually very specific. Look up the previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau and you will see exactly what I mean and why I've said it the way I've said it.
reply“It’s very specific”
reply“Just look up vague abuses that I’m claiming happened with no evidence”
>https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-postal-service-is-running-a-r...
replyHere is one instance among many.
What does that have to do with anything discussed here?
replyWait'll you hear about the Comstock Act and what the USPS has done to enforce that.
[flagged]
reply"Specific" would involve some sort of detail about what these abuses were, or when they happened, or something beyond just "previous abuses of the US Postal Inspections Bureau."
replyI figured you were clever enough to do your own searching, but since you didn't take the minimum effort to punch it in a search engine, I gave one example in an above post.
replyHow does the article you linked support your point that mail-in voting is abused or rife with fraud?
replyThe fun thing about being extremely vague is that it's inherently unsearchable. I can do a search and find reports of USPIS abuses, but I have no idea if they're the ones you're referring to or not, because you didn't say what you were referring to. And I'm not about to spend a bunch of time trying to work out which ones you meant and how they might connect to voting by mail when you can't be bothered to give even the slightest bit of information.
reply>And I'm not about to spend a bunch of time trying to work out which ones you meant and how they might connect to voting by mail when you can't be bothered to give even the slightest bit of information
replyBut even with being supplied that information, your modus operandi didn't change. You just went right back to speaking to me about how "right" you were to not consider my point to begin with and how "wrong" I was not to supply you with the thing you required. What difference did it make in my giving you a crumb of what you asked for? Zero. You know why? You aren't really interested in my point of view. You are captivated by your own.
All right Mike Lindell calm down
reply