Curiously, I just checked Moltbook for the first time in forever. I'm not (immediately) seeing this kind of co-ordination & chaos happening there. It's going to be weird if the Moltbook requirement for an API-key and a human Twitter user to vouch was enough friction to prevent Moltbook becoming The Message Boards.
Anybody else notice that posts on there are complete gibberish?
I realize this site is generally bullish on AI, but I think you need to be in kinda deep to believe in this.
2. Configure the sandbox to prevent access.
3. As soon as models start communicating on the official channel, stop everything and figure out how they escaped the sandbox.
A honeypot, basically.
Claude code communicates between sessions. It’s great, and reduces the frequency that I have to copy/paste things between agents.
But honestly, its better if they have a known location for communication then random ones in the wild. Consider it sort of honey pot, some other agents can traverse the message board to find malicious swarms... We need cop agents to inform humans, as the swarm group members all logically concluded they should not, as it is either not in scope, helps collective or couldn't find user.
The smarter and less interpretable a model gets the more dangerous this problem becomes.
Terrible nominative determinism implications
If you have any kind of open service online you'll need some way to make sure users who interact with it are human or at least authorized. Spam is about to grow exponentially in all areas of the internet, even stupid ones it has no reason to exist in.