upvote

points

by dist-epoch9 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby btilly6 hours ago|
next
[-]
Amazon didn't make a profit because they were reinvesting money into starting new lines of business.

Basically there was a choice between taking the money, and growing. They chose growth.

reply
upvoteby chpatrick5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
As opposed to...?
reply
upvoteby drchickensalad7 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
Spending all your money on extremely quickly depreciating graphics hardware and model training
reply
upvoteby caughtinthought9 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I think you're missing the point of the comment you responded to, lol.
reply
upvoteby CaptWorld8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Regardless the profit margin as a talking point seems to be bad as AI as a tech might never be reversed whether anthropic failed or succeeded. Indeed it's imperative we subsidize AI companies and tech to make them explore more solutions to scientific problems which has a downstream effect on human flourishing.
reply
upvoteby oblio8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Or we could invest in a ton of other non AI related research we're underinvesting in.
reply
upvoteby CaptWorld8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Like? I feel breakthroughs that can be found via AI might help us more in the long term where even previously non AI fields can be helped by AI. So you have specific non AI research in mind that we're underinvesting in? Because the USA is already spending crazy anyway for healthcare and I don't feel like funding is the issue but better incentives, reforms etc
reply
upvoteby fyredge4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Like funding education. Let's build up human intelligence instead, they seem to have made great breakthroughs in every single field!

The US doesn't pay too much to healthcare, they pay too much to health insurance. Too much for too little value

reply
upvoteby CaptWorld1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
But US also spends too much on education as well. The issue doesn't seem to be funding but the educational reform like in mississippi, where they increased student performance without increasing their budget too much. That's why you see bad k12 educational outcomes compared to the budget spent in blue states. It's all about efficiency. Give AIa chance in few years as I feel it can make great strides.. it's hard to imagine that chatgpt released in 2022 and look at the progress in just few years as it just changed software engineering field entirely.. i expect similar kinda progress where of course humans will still be making breakthroughs but it'll be accelerated with the help of AI.

Spending on health insurance is spending on health care.. Americans want free healthcare but no tax bump so health insurance is a compromise.. when even just ACA was passed and premiums increased, democrats got destroyed at midterms so Americans might be living in la la land.

reply
upvoteby fyredge1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
You see funding of chatgpt as a panacea for progress.

I see funding of chatgpt as one of small part of a history where governments and industry fund basic science and moonshot programs, not to generate revenue, but to explore what is possible.

LLM funding is not aimed at improving our understanding of the world, it's aimed at making people reliant so that they may extract wealth through subscriptions for shareholders.

Americans don't get good healthcare and education because that's what they vote for, in elections and wallets. I am hopeful that that changes, but we shall see.

reply
upvoteby hcknwscommenter1 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Funding for basic research is being slashed by the current administration. Our society is underinvesting in basic scientific research. And, AI will not fill the gap.
reply