upvote
Despite what people are saying here, chrome has a really excellent track record. Nobody is perfect. Switching just because chrome got exploited one time will likely result in you switching to something worse.

If you're paranoid, disable JIT.

reply
Or disable JS altogether, and enjoy many sites working much quicker. Many others fail & need to be selectively allowed, but it's been worth it.
reply
Vanadium makes improvements on Chromium. https://grapheneos.org/features#vanadium
reply
Most of those are just changing flags, not really unique development. Like "disable JIT" is a Chromium flag. "Zero-init everything" is a Clang flag.
reply
Right, but it's value-add on a derivative, not its own standalone engine.
reply
Firefox with uBlock Origin. It’s astonishing how many exploits uBO stops before they ever reach your browser engine. It’s the antivirus of the 2020s.
reply
Brave would be a much better option if you want security and good adblocking.
reply
Firefox absolutely does not have a better security track record than Chromium browsers and on top of it you’re recommending an extension as a security measure oh my god man this comment needs to be flagged dead

edit: links

https://www.reddit.com/r/GrapheneOS/comments/1unhtxu/initial...

https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

reply
The idea here is that uBlock filters the domains that may serve the malware in the first place. It basically works the same as a DNS filter.
reply
Which you can also easily do with uBlock Origin Lite in Chrome/Chromium.
reply
I'm willing to believe that stock chrome has a better record than stock Firefox, but

> and on top of it you’re recommending an extension as a security measure

... Yes? Why can a browser extension not be a security measure/improvement?

reply
I suggest Zen browser (fork of FF), it feels closer to chrome.
reply
I hear about Zen. Random q:

It can’t trick Canva into letting you use the color picker, or otherwise enable it, can it - if someone happens to know?

(What a dumb feature to be locked to the Googlesphere.)

reply
What does it mean "closer to chrome"?
reply
In a good way?
reply