upvote

points

by fedpost8 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby pavon7 hours ago|
next
[-]
This administration has done nothing to end or undermine the antitrust cases against Google. In both cases the judges found Google in violation of antitrust law, but both handed down fairly mild remedies, despite the administration (prosecutor) pushing for much stronger changes. The judges were appointed by Clinton (Leonie Brinkema) and Obama (Amit Mehta).
reply
upvoteby pjjpo21 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Here's a link in case it's needed (I suspect most people that assume all of their problems are because of the administration don't actually read links but maybe if it's from their court?)

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/09/us-court-rules-googl...

reply
upvoteby eesmith2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Perhaps not US cases, but those aren't the only antitrust cases against Google.

What about Trump's threats after Google was hit with a 2.95 billion Euro fine from the European Commission's antitrust investigation?

From last year: "EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič on Monday made an 11th-hour intervention to stop the European Commission from issuing a penalty against American tech giant Google for its search advertising practices, amid continued trade threats from U.S. President Donald Trump." https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-google-antitrust-decision...

Or from https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/10/google-meta-big-tech-6-billi... "In February, Trump signed a memorandum stating the U.S. would consider tariffs to “combat digital service taxes (DSTs), fines, practices, and policies that foreign governments levy on American companies.”"

That memorandum is at https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-pr...

reply
upvoteby pampas6 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
No politicians are going to fight a media company. They're in the PR and advertising supply chain.
reply
upvoteby lostlogin5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
‘Lake America’ buys breathing time too.
reply
upvoteby shevy-java1 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
The administration is serving private business only. They don't care about the people.

It is not a democracy nor a republic state. It is an oligarchy. Thankfully more and more people realise how corrupt the orange mafia is. Recent polls show that - people learn slowly, but they learn.

reply
upvoteby Mountain_Skies8 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
[flagged]
reply
upvoteby patates1 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
So we cannot say anything bad about the current administration without being divisive? What does criticising them tell you about tribalism?
reply
upvoteby shevy-java1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
The point is that no matter which party rules, they are bribed by big business to represent the interest of big business. Criticism without change does not really work well.
reply
upvoteby asdf889908 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Exactly. It is like Google has only emerged during this administration with their shenanigans.
reply
upvoteby Geezus_421 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
What rock have you been living under?
reply
upvoteby usr11064 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
It seems to be very popular on this site to condemn surveillance capitalism and billionaires. But who built and still maintains the basis for their power, misusing it and the billions. So-called smart engineers like many of HN readers. If they rated morale higher than their personal 100Ks we would not need to wait for a government to stop the misery (in vain).

Yes, I have worked for 400,000 employees corp, then for a 70,000. For the last 15 years I have staid under 100. The pay is less, but it's easier to look into the mirror each morning.

reply
upvoteby 8note7 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
iirc lina khan was appointed during the first trump admin and got most of her work done suing to split google during the biden admin?

you are a bit out of the loop if you think this is a partisan issue, or specifically one thats only there when trump is in charge

reply
upvoteby manlymuppet6 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Allow me to be anal for a moment, but what is the point of doing “if I remember correctly” for something like this?

You can very easily look up exactly when Lina Khan was appointed and get answer very quickly. Is it not worth the effort checking these things before commenting?

Ok rant over. Sorry to be an asshole. This is not your fault as much a standard which should be changed.

reply
upvoteby c0balt7 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
She got nominated by Biden in Biden's last term in March of 2021 and left in 2025 two weeks after Trump assumed office.

She did not get appointed under Trump nor did substantial work done under his administration.

Edit: I do not necessarily disagree with your comment on the partisan aspects of this issue. This is only meant to respond to the first paragraph.

reply
upvoteby thephyber6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Using Lina Khan as an example (your only example?) undermines your point because she started upset Biden and was quickly fired after Trump 2 started.
reply