The second one was very clear and to the point. Parsing it was rewarded with instant understanding and I enjoyed the word choice. The first one was just annoying; I could tell it was just listing a bunch of pointless analogies to try to make its point sound more grandiose so I immediately started skimming, and didn't come away feeling like it meant much other than "we all die in the end". The second one made an actual point and was the one that made me want to read it. The first one was the chore for me.
replyThe first communicated a feeling. A brief flutter in the soul of a picture of recognition, painted for your mind's eye with care by the author.
replyThe second transcribed considerable information bandwidth through intentionally structured word choice for maximal density.
That was exactly my experience, and I found it to be a little bit depressing.
reply