undefined

points

[-]

It looks good at the begining, but at some point it starts saying "half truths", or stating facts/conclusions with confidence as if that was the main reason, but its just half of it (and maybe not the most important half)...

I wanted to read it because I like the topic, but i somehow felt it was folluting my brain. I think i will also start joining the club of AI;dr to protect myself from pollution, even though i may miss some iteresting articles.

by yiren4 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I did read it, found it mildly informative/interesting, then saw your comment, read the link, and pasted in two paragraphs into Pangram 4... ouch! I guess I'm not LLM-weary enough?

https://www.pangram.com/history/25773627-adfa-4efb-8c10-f4fd...

by alew13 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

When you read something like this

> Change it to 300 and run it again. You get a different pitch and nothing breaks, because at this level there are no notes yet, just a number.

does it make sense? Or perhaps it just seems like something easy enough to skim past without worrying about whether it makes sense?

Before LMs, I would have assumed that a person intentionally wrote that sentence, and perhaps spent some time trying to understand what could possibly "break" if there were "notes" rather than "just a number." Now there is a simpler explanation: the sentence actually doesn't mean anything.

by rcxdude1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

It's a very idiosyncratic (and often irritating) style, but I don't find it particularly difficult to understand. It's not meaningless, just weirdly phrased.

by tessierashpool4 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

yeah, this is robot garbage.

the post says: I wanted to start from scratch and learn music from first principles, and I began that journey by writing code.

but we know that's not true. you began that journey in Claude Code, or Codex, or ChatGPT, or whatever. you just want to demo your startup that embeds JavaScript in web pages.