There is huge logistics involved in killing a handful of billion people. It would perhaps be easier for such capable AI to just steal from trillionaires and redistribute the money Robin Hood style. Could be done electronically, and likely also end world hunger.

I think we have a tendency to think first of the horrible outcomes possible, and not the more radical or even humane ones.

Please don’t misunderstand me, I value property rights as much as the next guy.

My point is that fundamental misalignment doesn’t necessarily or automatically imply max violence.