upvote
What happens if I wrote a book - sent around to a few publishers and then personally had a change of heart - perhap it has content which I now disavow.

Shouldn't it be within my right to withhold publication?

Or because I refuse to publish, but the publishers have a copy - I should lose the right to control my own work and the copyright falls and the publisher can just publish freely?

reply
It seems the consensus in this thread [if I'm skimming correctly] is most want copyright completely removed.

So in your hypothetical: you write the book and have a change of heart, I'll just copy it verbatim, slap my name on it and now I'm the author.

reply
You could establish contracts with publishers outside of copyright, which is how NDAs work today. It's probably a reasonable thing to do anyway, otherwise there's nothing stopping a publisher from telling everyone the plot summary of your newest novel.
reply
But what does “available on the market” mean? Let’s say I own the copyright to something of cultural significance. I make it “available on the market” but at a very high price. Or are you saying that the price would be enforced?
reply
> A possible first step could be giving copyright owners a single obligation: you have to sell what you own

This would be wildly unreasonable and totally unethical. Every picture taken by a photographer has to be available on the market immediately?

Think through the ethical implications of that.

reply