upvote

points

by seizethecheese1 days ago |
comments
upvoteby missinglugnut1 days ago|
next
[-]
How many of those 64% had their accident because of phones/drugs/recklessness and claimed to be distracted instead? With all the liability and shame involved in fatal crashes there's absolutely no way people are going to honestly self report illegal behavior.
reply
upvoteby fn-mote1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
Phones definitely fall in that category. I’m guessing they are the majority, but I don’t know how to substantiate that.

Hopefully police are figuring out that one of the parties in the accident is high while they do the interview.

reply
upvoteby Gigachad1 days ago|
prev|
next
[-]
The human brain was not designed for a task which requires hours of siting down doing mostly nothing while being hyperfocused the entire time ready to take over in an instant on the rare occasion something happens. While running or cycling your brain is actively engaged keeping yourself upright and avoiding obstacles which keeps you alert.
reply
upvoteby nomel1 days ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Seems at least somewhat comparable to walking through a forest full of predators, while, say, hunting/gathering.

Evidence that is is compatible with our psyche is the fact that we're at 1.19 fatalities per 100 million miles driven, and ~50% of those being booze and/or speeding.

reply
upvoteby tialaramex1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
That's true. Humans are bad at this task. On the railways they have a problem with this too, "Lookout" seems like a ludicrously easy job, but it's basically impossible because you must pay attention to an incredibly boring thing for hours or your friends might die. Getting rid of human lookouts should be a priority but it feels easy and so it's hard to motivate this.
reply
upvoteby annzabelle1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
This is also a big challenge for airline pilots. The planes mostly fly themselves these days, and most takeoffs and landings are uneventful. Being an airline pilot involves an absolutely massive amount of business as usual and preparation, for the very rare times something happens and you suddenly need a team of very focused experts to solve a difficult problem in a stressful environment.
reply
upvoteby fn-mote1 days ago|
parent|
[-]
At least they have simulators. Last time I saw a driving simulator I was a teenager.

Imagine you had to pass a simulator test involving responding to ANY crisis while driving before your license would be renewed. Rates of driving would plummet.

I bet most drivers don’t even correctly handle a flat tire on the expressway.

reply
upvoteby grosswait23 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
I disagree. The human brain reinforces circuitry that is used often, meaning the human brain is generally quite adaptable. Ancient (and modern) hunters sit still and silent for hours waiting for game, with their brains ready to take over in an instant on the rare occasion something happens.
reply
upvoteby estearum22 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Right but you don't get in car accidents or near-accidents often. Ergo your brain becomes wired for the 99.9999999% of driving that is completely uneventful.

Hunters are a self-selecting group of people who enjoy the activity you describe. If you don't like it or can't do it, you just don't do it.

Virtually every single adult in America has to drive, however, to live a functional life.

reply
upvoteby kelipso19 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
You are avoiding cars constantly when driving with a non-zero amount of traffic. Way more incidents than predators in the savanna while doing persistence hunting.
reply
upvoteby estearum17 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Not sure what you're arguing.

Your brain gets used to in-distribution events.

Car accidents (and the conditions that cause them) are out-of-distribution events.

It's that simple.

reply
upvoteby kelipso17 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
That’s not how the brain works. It is evolutionary adapted to stay alert for out of distribution events.
reply
upvoteby estearum16 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Correct, and by the time an out of distribution event happens in a car, you are milliseconds from collision (if that).

Most car accidents are effectively instantaneous. The fact your brain perks up as a bumper is coming through your side window is not very helpful.

reply
upvoteby throw0101a1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
> The human brain was not designed for a task which requires hours of siting down doing mostly nothing while […]

The average one-way commute time in the US is less than half an hour:

* https://www.census.gov/topics/employment/commuting/guidance/...

If you can't pay attention for less than 30 minutes should you really be operating a multi-ton death machine?

reply
upvoteby Gigachad1 days ago|
parent|
next
[-]
The average person can't last even the length of an elevator trip without reaching for social media.
reply
upvoteby fn-mote1 days ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Their point is that a “driver take over autonomous” mode is useless because nobody would pay attention to their surroundings at all.
reply
upvoteby 1 days ago|
prev|
next
[-]
deleted
reply
upvoteby mostly_harmless18 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
no. As per the link, that is 64% of <<distracted driver>> fatalities were "lost in thought". not 64% of <<all>> fatalities. Distracted driving is the 2nd or 3rd largest factor in fatal accidents (behind speed and alcohol I believe). Somewhere around 20-30%. Though this is for fatalities. Distribution is going to be way different for just hospitalization or property damage accidents.
reply
upvoteby tialaramex1 days ago|
prev|
[-]
You can see it in what people say right after an accident, stuff like "He came out of nowhere".
reply