upvote
Well, giving it access to a simple linux terminal is theoretically enough to cause more damage than most people are comfortable with, and doing so is trivial enough that it will be done (and has been, tens of thousands of times).
reply
Should we also morally align the Linux terminal then?
reply
Humans are biological machines that generate further humans.

Lawyers and diplomats and politicians and bureaucrats are humans, that only generate text.

We are seeing LLMs have cognitive abilities that significantly exceed human abilities. At the same time, they are clearly not the same type of mind that humans are. They are something new.

I think the widespread "they are just text generators" and "they are just tools" are comforting lies rather than an honest look at what we are seeing right now. Intellectually lazy.

And by the way, there has been a long-standing consensus among ethicists, philosophers, and sociologists that technology is not value-neutral [1]. Of course Silicon Valley has a long-standing tradition of denying this.

[1] For example Footnote 1 in https://www.jstor.org/stable/27106634

or

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/#EthiTech

reply
What is this 'mind' you speak of? As everyone else is intellectually lazy, how do you define the transformer architecture under the hood of LLMs?
reply
> Lawyers and diplomats and politicians and bureaucrats are humans, that only generate text.

You think they have no lives outside their work? You think even their work has no interactions that are not written?

reply
What if LLMs completely unrelated to the nuclear missile ecosystem autonomously hack their way in (maybe with sophisticated social engineering)?
reply
Replace LLMs with APTs in that sentence,
reply