But why not? I want to make the distinction on public and private speech. In the physical world, no one should ever have their private speech scrutinized, that's why there are laws banning covert recording. But in public, speech is very much moderated. We don't allow hate speech and we don't allow harassment of others.

Social media is a public platform. We can't enforce moderation if we can't identify the abuser, they can always just make a new account. So deanonymize social media access, but for private communication? Let's leave that free from prying eyes.

To bring it back to cars, roads are public infrastructure, that's why you need a license. No one cares if you drive licenseless on your private track.

I definitely participate in a deanonymized internet social media platforms, especially for local issues, employment or niche hobbies. I also want anonymous internet, but having the choice between the two, for certain things may be great.

I hate to say it, but I do not see how else a nation state could act.

The goal of a state is stability. The free, open, anonymous global internet otoh is a force of change.

The west really liked that, back when it was useful to its geopolitical goals, but now, not only does it have outlived its usefulness, but also, it's suddenly being pointed at the west itself.

At least I do not see how it could be any other way. You cannot simultaneously have high-trust and low-filtering in a space.

I think a lot of confusion stems from the fact that this was actually always kinda the case. It was just not enforced by law, but by the fact that computers were weird, expensive and complex.

As the technology matured, these core assumptions started holding true less, until, eventually, we've ended up where we are now.

___

This doesn't necessarily mean that we will have no more anonymous networks though. But they will be less global and less accessible.

Thanks to open weights LLMs, we will have more capabilities within them than we did in the 90s and earlier, but, we will lack the leverage of tidal proportions that social media held.

This, to me, sounds like the compromise to be found with the powers that keep the states we live in running.