upvote
The notification the Messaging app produces should have the option to copy the one time code directly.
reply
You're using software from an alpha channel.

People sometimes.

reply
Alpha lowers the expected level of polish and stability - it doesn't make every regression equally acceptable. It is a reasonable criticism even when released to the alpha channel.

Further, I believe it's reasonable for users' expectations to be influenced by what the project itself communicates about the development process.

> People sometimes.

I have experienced many (relatively minor but some annoying) bugs in GrapheneOS the past few years, without complaint to the developers. And have submitted bug reports and logs. I'm "in the trenches", not just slinging mud from the outside. If I were in a better financial situation right now, I would be donating too.

reply
This is somewhat true. I expect more regressions from released commercial software.

I suspect there are fewer regressions per release on graphenes alpha messenger than there are in googles message's app.

reply
It's doubly disappointing because just 4 days ago the project wrote [1], on using AI for the new Messaging app:

Why? Using an LLM as an additional reviewer seems like a good use of LLMs? Personally I have found LLMs very useful for that and they catch issues that other experienced programmers do not always find. It’s not like they are vibecoding a messages app.

reply
What do you mean "why"? For the exact reason he stated in his first paragraph - a serious regression impacting his workflow.
reply
... which seems to have nothing to do with using an LLM to do extra review.
reply
My comment makes it pretty clear what the disappointment is:

> shame an obvious regression happened for one of my primary use-cases: copying one-time codes

Then the "later" is that even with frontier AI review tools, it was still missed

I am not alleging vibe coding - that's a strawman.

reply