The thing is mainly there are no quality options available. It's mostly all cheap shit or slightly more expensive, but still equally shit.
So how can this reveal preference if there are no options?
replyI would argue the surge in vintage clothing ecosystems is an indication there is an unmet demand.
There’s certainly options above temu junk. Maybe it doesn’t meet your bar but I’ve found the 100% cotton stuff from Uniqlo to be massively higher quality than the average. I’ve got tshirts from them I’d guess I’d worn and washed 80+ times.
replyYou can still go to a tailor and commission jackets, trousers and shirts, made with the same quality of fabrics and manufacturing techniques. With shoes, you can still go and buy hand welted shoes.
replyIt all comes at a price but I don't disagree that we have a barbell problem here (ie cheap fast fashion or bespoke, with nothing in the middle).
There absolutely are still rich-people brands that sell absurd quality at absurd price.
replySee, for example, Marine Layer in San Francisco, or boutiques like Red Ants Pants.
Not just rich people, I pay maybe 3 times more for my T-shirts than the average person. I'm certain they last me at least twice as long, probably 3 times and they're way nicer to wear.
replyThat's not actually "revealed consumer preference" for quantity over quality. It's just that it's impossible for the average consumer to assess quality.
reply