I’m curious how you guys keep track of each model’s coding capabilities. The landscape keeps changing. I don’t suppose you benchmark all frontier models every other month, right?
replyI use them. Daily. Gemini hasn’t been a contender by comparison for a long time.
replyI wonder if it's a harness thing or a model thing at this point. I feel all coding models are quite capable for most tasks I want them to do.
replyMost of the time I don't need what the bench tests and I'm not really giving them completely ambiguous tasks without any refinement.
I only find marginal differences between models at this point and it almost feels like personality quirks in each model than anything.
When comparing OpenAI and Claude thats pretty much true, but not Gemini... And have you tried Antigravity? Yikes
replyThe CLI version of agy is great. Have you tried it?
replyDo you dangerously allow permissions? I absolutely cannot use it until they ship an auto approver. As it is now I have it write one bash/python script to do everything it wants to, then I review that. Otherwise it is COMPLETELY unusable and it shocks me when I hear people are using it.
replySounds like they shipped some changes today that might reduce approvals: https://x.com/antigravity/status/2100001904969297980
reply alias agy="agy --dangerously-skip-permissions"is anti gravity open sourced just like codex or grok code?
replyCompared to gemini-cli that they took out behind the woodshed, I hate it.
replyI've used Antigravity as my main coding agent on one of my biggest projects for about a year. It's been great for me. (and I use Claude, Codex, Grok and Muse for all the other projects)
replyTrue but it has a niche in SQL reviews for me. Looks like Google has a lot of good sql in their corpus and in their RL digital lobotomy factory.
replyI did a test involving implementing cobol control flow in Java for a source to source translation project. Gemini was the only model to get the edge cases. Cobol is very peculiar in this regard.
replyIt's very good at Elixir in my experience too. And it just does what I ask and doesn't wind me up like Opus. I don't think I've had to insult it more than once per day.
replyI had a typical $20 Gemini plan that I just downgraded to their $5 plan (to keep access to some of the models). It had been so long since I let Gemini work on (or review) any code / design / html (anything) that I couldn't justify bothering to keep wasting money on it. It fell behind badly over the past year. Astra might as well be an alien super intelligence at code compared to Gemini. I enjoy talking to Gemini, it is very good at conversation, I get solid answers to everyday questions. I intend to keep the $5 plan indefinitely for basic use. I don't expect they'll ever resurface as a competitor in coding with Astra & Fable et al.
replyThat might depend on whether you are translating fiction or nonfiction.
replyAnecdotally I'd rate Gemini behind Claude and OpenAI models at fiction and I can't find any benchmarks showing Gemini is the clear winner at this task.
I found that it's shockingly good with R. (the only language I know and can correct for)
replyI doubt they even intended it to be, but it seems like I kept going from resorting to 3.5-3.8 (over time) to realizing that Claude and GPT, while great at Python, will make rudimentary mistakes with R; even when they compose giant complicated R code.
I'm guessing this is partly because of Gemini's world knowledge. I tried asking the model multiple internet humor and memes and it answered correctly around 80% of the time
replydeleted
reply