upvote
That's good.

Side note - just like most people don't need an intelligent personal assistant to manage and respond their emails and book their flights, most people also don't need smart homes. Century old toggle switches are more than enough in a 3 room apartment or 5 room house unless you have a mention.

reply
My primary beef with smart home (having tried it) is that every person that visits your home ends up confused about some element of it. A light switch that goes up and down is universally understood.
reply
My smarthome has regular switches and wifi.

There's no reason to not do both.

Also a quick NFC sticker in each room taking you to a small HTML site containing settings (temp, ventilation, lights, shutters, setting a alarm by the lights) has been golden.

No one wants to: download Shelly app + AC app + look for ventilation IR controller + figure out how casting works for the TV + figure out how to use the Shelly app to turn lights into an alarm. It's too much friction for little gain. But a quick tap? Great.

But tapping your phone on a NFC sticker bringing all those controls together per room in stead of per category (all lights in Shelly app. Person in room #1 has no interests in the lights in room #4 at the same time.).

IF you tap it while not on Wifi yet it just tells you to connect to Wifi. :-)

One "all house" sticker next to the front door allows any last person leaving or first person entering to put the entire house in active / idle mode.

Works wonders. And as soon as local AI is quick enough the stickers will be a microphone!

reply
That's clever and all - solid setup, good work. But I still think you either overestimate the average house guest or have particularly savvy/young house guests.
reply
Most people think it's cool but use it once.

The regular-ceiling-lights-as-alarm service gets positive feedback. Weird how smarthome companies never market that, seems easy win.

reply
Need is a big word. Convenience is also a factor.

We have 8 light buttons in our living room/dining room/kitchen space. It is very convenient to us that we have 1 button for turning all of them on/off at the door to upstairs (at night turn off all lights and go to bed upstairs, in the morning come downstairs and turn on all lights) - but also have 1 on/off button near our back door for when we leave/come home.

Next to that: on/off toggles a schedule where the lights are bright and cold-ish by day, and low and warm by night without us having to manually adjust each light every hour or something.

Again, need is a big word. But it's very convenient and pleasant.

reply
This is very cool. However I don’t really want to bounce all my home automation commands to the cloud. I hope there will be an open weights approach one day. I’ve spent a lot of time setting up my local only home automation system, it would suck if it didn’t work during an internet outage, and also there are obvious privacy problems.
reply
GLiClass is performant, and its zero-shot classification scores are in the same ballpark as the Terra-level results Jev points to.

https://github.com/knowledgator/gliclass

reply
thanks, it's definetly relevant
reply
Thanks!
reply
Rereading some things and because there's no official benchmarks, I misspoke about the ballpark comparison., but the open model's still a useful foundation to work with
reply
This video makes a better job at explaining what it is about vs the marketing ones. Thanks for sharing.
reply
Guess I'm a bit less impressed seeing that for some of the more intelligent driven+action work -- splitting requests in the video -- they had to kick out to an anthropic model.
reply
That's fair, but it highlights how this would actually be used. It doesn't really seem like a competitor to other models but instead a way to make these real systems more enjoyable to deal with.
reply
Haiku, to rewrite a sentence as two discreet commands.

I agree that it was notable that they delegated to an existing LLM, but I don't think it detracts much from the value proposition (not yet proven) of their demo.

reply
Agreed but is it much easier to deal with if you need to have all of these sub processes integrated? How does one know when you need to reword a request? What if Anthropic then has a type error, then debugging that just got harder.
reply
deleted
reply
deleted
reply
That's a really nice demo and way more helpful than their website, thanks for sharing it!
reply
That really helped figuring out what this thing does, thank you.
reply