What? Those three sentences are not really compatible with each other?! Like, they are mutually exclusive and each appears to hold a different position.

How is what I wrote (that you seem to not see universal benefit) in bad-faith (honestly trying to understand what you mean) if you then add:

> I don't see how and why this feature should become a default in all smartphones [...]

So, do you see universal value or not? Cause you again said you do not and that was precisely what I wrote, that you do not seem to despite it being obvious to anyone who thinks about why phones of any price have cameras.

Should I honestly start writing a list why private as well as business users of smartphones may want, even need this? Is that really required? Consider every use case of a camera on a phone, please, before I feel the need to do that.