upvote
It's not hard to sandbox Pi without adding anything substantial to the actual size of the system prompt, which is what HarnessTax is mostly measuring. Wrapping it in nono.sh costs approximately zero tokens.

(I do think Pi should ship with more than zero builtin sandboxing though)

reply
I have a couple hundred line TUI that just clones an LXD container and I get all my repos and infra isolated in 5s with pi having isolation to that container. Swap between any instance. Port forward to host all automatic.

Funny to me how stuff is described these days. Seems like some people lack the full understanding of all these different systems and really overcomplicate their harness setups or use super bloated all in one tooling.

reply
I tried putting my agent in an LXC / Incus container but then I also needed it to process videos stored on a NAS, and that was not easy at all. I tried a FUSE-based NFS client [1] but it was very flaky and would randomly report files having zero length and fail processing.

[1] https://github.com/facebookarchive/nfusr

reply
Do you have any links that would explain this?

I'm looking at changing my AI harness and am definitely interested in this

reply
You can sandbox with tool hooks, at least in antigravity, I think a lot of other harnesses support similar features. Sandboxing via the prompt is just dangerous and unreliable.
reply
The developers of pi.dev are geniuses.

They add a --tools flag, which can only add tools onto the built-in tools, so if you wanted to sandbox pi.dev by adding sandboxed versions of the existing tools you will have to run pi.dev via

    pi --no-tools --tools tool1, tool2, tool3
except..., that's not enough to sandbox pi.dev, because remember, it's a minimalist coding agent! So what does a minimalist coding agent do? Of course! It loads extensions by default and do you know what extensions can do? they can add default tools that bypass --no-tools!

So if you want to sandbox your agent, guess what you'll have to do? Yep, you have to supply --no-extensions.

Here is how to run pi.dev under its most minimal configuration under a sandbox:

    pi --no-tools --no-extensions --tools tool1, tool2, tool3 -e ./your-sandboxing-extension
Pretty neat, huh?

Sources: https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/issues/555

reply
Wonder if you have any source to back that data, unless you are referring to the security code to detect the user and their usage itself to prevent against unauthorized usage patterns?
reply
> Much of the extra weight of Claude Code and Codex harness are (ostensibly?) for security and alignment purposes.

Um, no? Have you actually read Claude Code's system prompt and tools?

Here's Fable's system prompt: https://github.com/navanchauhan/agent-autopsy/blob/6d9c00e54...

There are a few lines of what I would call "for security and alignment purposes", but it's not the majority. And the majority of the bloat is from the tool descriptions.

The system prompt in this case has pretty much nothing to do with the built-in guard rails, that is: you cannot sidestep Claude's guard rails by editing/replacing the system prompt (which you officially can with Claude Code's `--system-prompt-file`).

reply
[dead]
reply