In my experience it's the opposite. AI tends to make interesting things boring. You spend less time building a deep understanding by doing the hard but rewarding work yourself, and you focus more on developing a more superficial understanding by studying someone else's work. There are some productivity gains, depending how well defined the tasks are and how well the ability to produce more translates to creating more value. But at the same time, an increasingly large part of the work feels like bureaucracy with no inherent value.

> proving to inventing new theories and finding new conjectures with the help of AI

This is exactly the activity Tao and others worry will be hollowed out by instant "true/false" responses to novel questions.