upvote
we'd still have editor that only support one language properly

Emacs supported zillions of languages before LSP.

Zoom out.

reply
If the old emacs approach is so much better, why is emacs switching to using LSP?
reply
As someone that got introduced to it in 1996, and was a fan of XEmacs variant, still remembers enough keybindings and Elisp, supported beyond plain syntax highlighting was very much hit and miss, even nowadays.
reply
I have been an emacs user for over a decade now, and if you think that language “support” was as good before LSP, I have a bridge to sell you.
reply