Do people really care much about how beautiful a human made poster look like? I don’t think I’ve ever seen that as an issue, a poster doesn’t have to look fancy. Though if I love any art piece then learn later it was made by AI I will for sure update my judgement and dismiss it as if I was tricked in the first place. You’re way better using Word art for your poster than delegating to an AI if you don’t want to receive negative attention
replyAn AI generated poster signals low effort. If you're too lazy or too cheap to make a real poster it makes me wonder what other corners have been cut.
replyNone of the AI haters (or haters in general) are willing to put money where their mouths are. None of them are willing to pay for better human artwork, yet have the audacity to criticize as if top artists owe them free output.
replyYou think that no one who criticizes AI pays for human artwork?
replyThat is a bizarre stance
Do you think the vast majority who criticize AI pays for good human artwork? Now that is a bizarre stance.
replyYou think most people don’t pay for movies, music, games, clothing with designs, art, etc.?
replyUnless they've been in a coma all their life until 2022... Yes? You think only pirates are anti-AI or something? What are you getting at?
replyMotte and bailey; "none" -> "vast majority"
replyI know plenty of people (including myself) who pay for good human artwork :)
> yet have the audacity to criticize as if top artists owe them free output
replyLiterally nobody is saying that, what are you talking about
Which critic is proposing funding better artwork, made by good human artists? Sometimes, silence says more than words. Non-decision is also a decision.
replySo you can't criticize something without coming up with some fantasy plan that will only exist in whatever corner of social media you left that comment, to make that criticism somehow now valid?
replyWhy are you making such wide assumptions? I pay for art constantly. Where's this blatantly wrong suggestion coming from?
reply