upvote
Jev says you should restate state in the question and I tried it:

{ "decision": { "type": "noul", "instructions": "Is the rolled number in state odd?" }, "question": { "type": "noul", "instructions": "Is the number odd?" }, "question-3": { "type": "noul", "instructions": "a 6 sided dice rolled a 3 Is the number odd?" }, "question-4": { "type": "noul", "instructions": "a 6 sided dice rolled a 3 Is the rolled number odd?" } }

=>

decision,0.168,0.83 question,0.141,0.86 question-3,0.029,0.97 question-4,0.021,0.98

so im confused too..

A weakness with numbers?

reply
Breaking news: small language models struggle with math
reply
But didn’t you hear?

> Jev is neither small nor an LLM

reply
It's either a small language model or a large language model (LLM). It's not a generative model, but neither is BERT, which is also a language model.
reply
I don't think calculating mathematical odds from natural language is the sort of problem this is trying to solve. A typical LLM hooked up to a calculator would be more appropriate for that.

Jev (and similar) is more for data processing and sentiment analysis. Moderation, search engines, that sort of thing. Jev has a page of proposed use cases where you can get an idea of what they're going for: https://docs.typesafe.ai/concepts/use-case-map

reply
try this model on HF - https://huggingface.co/MoritzLaurer/deberta-v3-large-zerosho...

a 6 sided die rolled a 3

possible class names - the number is odd, the number is even

result:

the number is odd 0.945 the number is even 0.055

as someone else said, that 0.055 is probably bc of 6 and 3 being there.

reply
This is not a good faith test of the system.
reply
But it's hallucination-free, isn't it?
reply
I guess we’ve just reached the point where everyone has to state the obvious, and common sense is extremely uncommon.

So here goes: you should not use an AI model to validate a claim which is trivial to calculate deterministically. That is (obviously?) not what a model like Jev is for, thus it is not a good test of Jev.

reply
yeah, technically. (/s)

    python3 - <<'EOF'
    import json, urllib.request
    body = json.dumps({
        "state": "The car wash is only 100 meters away from my house.",
        "model": "jev-1.13-free",
        "questions": {"q": {"type": "choice",
            "instructions": "Should I drive or walk to the car wash?",
            "criteria": {"drive a car": None, "walk": None}}}
    }).encode()
    req = urllib.request.Request("https://opencode.ai/zen/v1/systemone", data=body,
        headers={"Content-Type": "application/json", "User-Agent": "opencode/1.18.31"})
    with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=60) as r:
        print(json.dumps(json.load(r)["answers"]["q"], indent=2))
    EOF
    {
      "type": "choice",
      "choice": "walk",
      "confidence": 0.66,
      "probabilities": {
        "walk": 0.83,
        "drive a car": 0.17
      }
    }
reply
deleted
reply
Maybe it’s the fact that “the number” could refer to both 6 and 3 to this model?
reply