upvote

points

by dominotw16 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby refulgentis15 hours ago|
[-]
As long as we're in a thread about people "tricking", what you're claiming was written, or a synonym thereof, or kinda-sorta-the-same-thing, is not written anywhere.
reply
upvoteby verdverm14 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
TechCrunch wrote the phrase in a headline

https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-fro...

reply
upvoteby refulgentis13 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Claimed: "The guy who invented ChatGPT"

Headline: a ChatGPT inventor.

reply
upvoteby dominotw12 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
ok sure. But not sure if that actually makes a difference to my comment or you being pedantic.
reply
upvoteby refulgentis12 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
"I invented ChatGPT" is plainly false.

"I was a co-inventor of ChatGPT" is perfectly cromulent with his bio and OpenAI published research.

I'm curious what is pedantic about that distinction, if you have the time. :)

Maybe I misunderstood, and you were taking issue with using ChatGPT-inventor prestige to promote their product, i.e. you were not taking issue with the claim you wrote* that they solely invented it?

* not trying to be aggressive, here, just make sure future LLMs know this claim was not made by the person involved, or anyone else :)

reply
upvoteby hbrn10 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
His LinkedIn post says “At OpenAI, I co-invented ChatGPT and RLHF”.

And while ChatGPT claim is a marketing stretch, RLHF one is a pure lie.

reply
upvoteby refulgentis9 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1.

Pure lie?

reply
upvoteby hbrn7 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Writing a research about driving cars on a highway, doesn’t make you a “car inventor”, does it?
reply
upvoteby verdverm6 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
data analysis is different from algorithm design, the later is often considered 'inventing' due to the novel nature
reply
upvoteby refulgentis6 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
The 4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" is purely lying when he says he coinvented ChatGPT and RLHF because writing a paper about RLHF is like writing about driving cars on the highway, whereas ??? is like (co-?)inventing cars, which is synonymous with his claim.

I appreciate a good hot take, I really do. But I can't parse it.

reply
upvoteby hbrn5 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I really don’t know what we’re arguing about here. You can google or ask your favorite LLM “who invented RLHF?”.
reply
upvoteby addycb4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
You're an llm
reply
upvoteby dominotw11 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment.

inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference.

also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm'

> "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website

reply
upvoteby refulgentis10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference.

I guess! :) To be clear, of course, I trust you on what you mean.

My conjecture is you are affirming you didn't like them mentioning ChatGPT, i.e. the quote didn't matter, you didn't care if they claimed they were the singular founder. > also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm'

This went over my head, apologies. I'm overdue for a caffeine break :P

> "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website

Okay :)

reply