upvote
It's not easy to show so many data and make everyone happy about the way it is presented. In fact I'm aiming more at engineers and trying to provide as much info as it is possible to be clear about methodology and everything around it. But raw data is in JSON files so you can always make PR for creating additional view aimed at philosophers and not engineers ;)
reply
Speaking as someone who consumes this, I appreciate how it's laid out. As a developer, we can often see at a glance where the bottleneck is if we have enough data laid out - IOW, data overload for you is me feeling like a kid in a candy store.

Sometimes there are ways to make things easier without dumbing them down, but way too many people conflate the two; I get nervous when non engineers say "I've studied this, it should be easy".

reply
ah, yes that's obviously fine; I'm definitely coming fromt he perspective of "bored guy on a Saturday evening who happened to stumble across someone else's wall of charts on HN"
reply
I think the Phoronix test suite does pretty well for the end user who wants something easy to digest; the exact choice of benchmarks is sometimes odd but the harness itself is quite good.

At some point I'd like to get our own automated pts runs going, since Michael is not consistent with what hardware he tests on and he hasn't been consistent with getting them out.

reply