I think these are the worst I've seen, at least in some time. It's a silly benchmark though, not sure what to make of it
replyI think the result is fine. The benchmark is silly to the point of being useless nowadays.
replyIt used to be a mess in various interesting ways. Now, almost every big release can draw something perfectly functional.
So the question - without a correct answer - given the prompt "Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle":
Does the user want the least lines of code to make it functional, or the best looking version?
The user at the very least expects the bike to have bike geometry; Grok seems to struggle with that
replyexactly, the benchmark just needs to be downvoted into oblivion each times it's posted. The outcome is not deterministic and the model needs to determine what level of detail is appropriate for an svg. There is no wrong answer to this unless it's obviously un-Pelican-like.
replyIf you think this is bad, look up mistral.
replyit's not truly tested until it plays a match or ten in Brood War imo
replyI tried in Cursor and see a lot of improvements over Grok 4.6 svgs. The AA numbers indicate it's not very token efficient though: https://artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents?agents=co...
replyPoor fella doesn’t have a seat. Intriguing design where both pedals are on the same side of the frame. Balancing must be a challenge.
replyAre there good tools for doing context audits? I feel I have no good way to visualize what a new session is getting by default in a given repo without crawling through every potentially included markdown file
replyThe default reasoning level seems better than the high reasoning level:
replyHas a shadow
Better shaped beak
Leg position more realistic for bicycle riding
Better feathers
What is the default reasoning level?
replyHahaha. I remember when musk and his merry band of sycophants were bragging about grok producing the only physically accurate bicycle. What happened?
replyYeah, he had opinions: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/2023833496804839808
reply[dead]
replyWould be amazing to see this for frontend.
replyWow, thanks for sharing, fun benchmark!
reply[flagged]
reply