A 5090 has 2x tensor cores and 2x bandwidth and can be run at 400W (2x watts).
replyBeing fast and having a power target doesn’t mean it’s cost efficient though. I would pay the launch cost for one, but not 3-4x inflated.
replyHow does this relate to 4500 vs 5090? I'm just pointing out that 5090 likely has twice the performance of the 4500 and likely maintains that at 2x watts if you want.
replyYou didn't specify in your earlier post, so I wasn't sure exactly which comparison you were making. But yeah, the perf/watt actually looks the same for those, so the cost per token evens out. It is nice not having to manage 400+W though. I like the 4000 for that reason, it's effectively a 3090 that runs at half the TDP.
reply