Can you point at the marketing in this release to show me where that’s the lean?

Many people are allergic to “AI safety” as they perceive it as an attempt to deceive them. When they ask a factual question and get back an unfactual answer, it makes them upset. None of the people I know who feel this way are searching out CSAM. They accurately perceive that there is a team that wants answers to come out a certain way.

For instance, I’m loosely connected to people who care about animal safety in AI research. There are absolutely people spending their time pushing a narrative about _the_ ethical way to interact with animals. Feeling this not being forced onto you is kind of nice.

I would guess those working in AI see some possible ethical quandary but resigned themselves to an attitude of "it's happening either way". Although what csam and racism are we talking about? my observation on AI is they're all pretty cucked and boring to talk to. Or is the grok ai more liberal than others and unique? I used it a year or so ago when it came out and it seemed as gated as all the others.