upvote
There is a difference between wanting AGI (which not everyone does), and wanting it as fast as possible no matter the side effects and potential for vast harm. Homo sapiens is 300k years old, maybe it’s ok to delay AGI by like… 1 year if it meaningfully improve our ability to align the model?
reply
Well, there's a tension because, depending on who you ask, AGI is how you cure cancer and achieve utopia, but also how you kill all life on earth and turn the solar system into paperclips
reply
I'm good with the odds on those 2 scenarios. I believe humans could kill all life on earth without AI anyway.
reply
I think the goal is different from what "we" want anyway.
reply