I read the posts. He's obviously writing daily updates and posts and includes pictures from his travels.

The photos are obviously target shooting. This is a common sport in many countries.

Your argument is that because he wrote long daily updates about what he was doing and included two unrelated things, that he's implying that the guns are for those offhand remarks?

We get getting farther and farther from the real problem, which is that the UK police have been weaponized to respond to people's social media posts about how they make others feel. That's a ridiculously low bar.

From https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/consultant-arrested-posi...

> However, he said that a police officer later visited his home to warn him that concerns had been raised about the post.

> "I was told to be careful what I say online and I need to understand how it makes people feel," he said.

> Hopefully you can understand why the guy who owes him money would feel intimidated and call the police, and you can see why there appears to be enough evidence to charge the guy for harrassing the ower, and to arrest him so you can establish if he possesses the guns he has posted himself shooting.

No, I don't understand why he would.

Nothing there was intimidation. Pretending it is intimidation is stretching crudility. The fact that he got arrested over this is straight up nonsense, IMO.

All the posts read like blog-style posts, and there wasn't any aggressive language used there at all. He also mentioned he was meeting with people to resolve the issue through legal means in the posts.

I suspect the owner who owed him money was acting maliciously.