upvote

points

by try-working1 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby TazeTSchnitzel57 minutes ago|
[-]
Whoa there, hold your horses:

- There's an ongoing investigation into alleged election fraud, which has not yet proven anything

- The candidate himself is not even a suspect in that investigation

- The candidate is known to have had some contacts with Somali government officials in the past, but no relation to this election is alleged by said investigation

- So far, it doesn't sound like they even have actual evidence any fraud took place (https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/senaste-nytt-om-val-2026?...)

I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Remember that political opponents might have an incentive to fabricate allegations.

reply
upvoteby dcrazy52 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Given the user you are responding to is named “try-working” and is participating heavily in this post, arguing heavily on the side of “where there’s smoke there’s fire,” I think they might in fact be one such political opponent. Or at least politically opposed to the existence of Somali migrants in Sweden.
reply
upvoteby verdverm16 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
I often find myself wonder if the world would be a saner place had Trump actually won in 2020
reply
upvoteby try-working52 minutes ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
There are hundreds of reports of election fraud and the number being investigated is unknown but obviously a portiong of that.

Crimes investigated are per definition alleged.

You have no insight into any investigation so your claim that Somali state contacts are not part of any investigation is false.

There's plenty of evidence of fraud, and several hundred witnesses.

reply
upvoteby verdverm56 minutes ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
where's the fun (dopamine) in that though? /s
reply