upvote
Could you please explain what the difference is between first principles and higher order thinking?

Based on the moon example, it seems you define it as a set of principles you can base your decisions on? E.g. to get somewhere, you must minimize your distance. What makes something a first principle?

I'm asking because my understanding is that "reasoning from first principles" is just taking a step back, asking yourself what's really the goal and reasoning backwards. But it seems like you've got two different concepts (first principles and higher order thinking), which makes me think you've got it figured out more than I do.

reply
> ideological trap

First principles are not an ideology; they are more like laws of nature. Due to that, they are great both for reformulating a problem, and checking solutions.

reply
> they are more like laws of nature.

That's the ideology.

reply
That sounds like more like "sticking with the first idea no matter what" than like reasoning from first principles.
reply
yes that's the failure mode if one of your first principles is not to continuously reevaluate your first principles.
reply