undefined

points

[-]

You are obviously being disingenuous, because you are on a thread where the DoD is not just electing not to buy Anthropic's service, but also trying to bully them into submission with the unrealistic threat of the DPA, punitively and disproportionately trying to label them a national security risk, and invoking supply chain issues normally applied to our worst adversaries, for the first time putting an obviously patriotic American country on the same footing as North Korea, Iran, China and Russia.

Remember, the Anthropic red line was "no war crimes and no mass surveillance of the US population." You may think that war crimes are cool, and that mass surveillance of the US population by the department of defense would be fine, but consider the natural consequences, both for democracy and for any adversary's conduct in future wars.

by hardbass3 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

>obviously patriotic American country

Hi, just informing you of the typo.

by felixgallo1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

thanks. Company, of course

by sejje1 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

> You may think that war crimes are cool

It's really rich to say this after calling me disingenuous.

I don't think it's cool that Anthropic gets to set military policy. I don't care how much I agree or disagree with the policy. Wario is not the president. And Anthropic does not strike me as "obviously patriotic," not that I think it's better if the private company bossing the military around is patriotic. It has no relevance.

"Warcrimes" is the new "racist," too. It gets thrown around willy nilly about every military action.

by culi56 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

War crimes have a precise legal meaning and have for a long time. Get off of twitter and touch grass if you feel you're getting called racist too often.