Letterboxd Is Up for Sale, and A24, Sony and the New York Times Are Bidding
(www.worldofreel.com)
I continue to be baffled by this sale. Letterboxd was acquired by Tiny 3 years ago, Tiny’s entire premise is that they hold for the long term. Selling after 3 years is not long term. I don’t understand why Tiny would undermine their raison d’etre unless it’s because the founders (who retain a minority stake) are pushing for it.
replyTiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd
“Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.”
…?
I imagine that in life and business there’s no such thing as a decision that is never regrettable. I guess it just didn’t work out.
replyso you _believed_ them -- that is the only takeaway from this.
replyHaving such a high profile film rating site be potentially owned by a film studio has serious conflict of interest issues. Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released because of bad reviews. I'm happy to see this get some attention here after my submission didn't because the potential implications of this purchase are big.
reply> Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released
replyAny source on that ? I found nothing serious, just reddit and Facebook post. No one serious is reporting on it.
deleted
replyThe problem with Amazon owning IMDB, or A24 potentially owning Letterboxd, is not that they would screw with it, but that every move they make will be put through that lease. Even with NYT being the owners I’m sure there would be the regular ‘drama’ of whatever woke/anti-woke influence they may have over it.
replyIs there an ATproto or activity pub version of letterboxd? I like A24, but not sure how much I trust Sony or the NYT to run it reasonably
replyhttps://popfeed.social/ on ATproto
replyA24 is the biggest cheater on Letterboxd, buying 5 star raters en masse. Warner is not much better. Sony is ok.
replyWhat 5 start ratings have they purchased?
replyAmazing. So Imdb 2.0 has become Imdb 2.0.
replyWhy not $3B? or $30B, even?
replyI use https://movielens.org/ and it is ran by the University of Minnesota.
replyThis looks almost too good to be true! Thank you for sharing. I'm going to migrate my 600+ library over tonight.
replyDamn, that asking price is insane
replyHeh, the name makes it sound like a daemon.
replyservice letterboxd enable; service letterboxd start
Can't wait for the enshittification of Letterboxd.
replyDear God, don't let Amazon do what it did to Goodreads here.
Truly, everything good gets milked dry for someone's exit. I know that's usually celebrated in a forum like this, but is it possible things are just a bit out of balance?
replyso glad I move over to TMDB the other day. Letterboxd layout is the worst.
replyReferenced NYT piece (unlocked): https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/business/media/letterboxd...
replyRelated background on the state of growth there from a few months ago:
The Rise and (Potential) Fall of Letterboxd
If it's bought by A24 or Sony that's absolutely gonna be a conflict on interest and I cannot imagine the platform would ever be impartial for the reviews of their movies. It NYT buys it, then it would be turned into a woke nonsense project. I guess all good things must come to an end.
replypart of the charm of letterboxd is that its median reviewer is far more woke than every NYT contributor combined, imo.
reply