again, anthropic is snooping, section F specifically: [https://www.anthropic.com/legal/service-specific-terms].

"Then prove the other ai companies don't."

xAI zdr is not snooping, section 3.4: [https://x.ai/legal/terms-of-service-enterprise]

openai azure zdr is not snooping: [https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/foundry/openai/conce...]

gcp zdr is not snooping: [https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise-agent-platfo...]

only anthropic.

"Then prove that the service they offered to the US government didn't have spying disabled."

the service they offered did have spying disabled. the security risk is from anthropic updating the claude and covertly bricking or degrading it.

quote: "In such an ongoing relationship where the vendor [...] “continuously update[s] and tune[s] the product,” the Department must establish and maintain confidence that the vendor will not add limitations that interfere with the Department’s use of the product." (p26)

"the Department relies on [petitioner] to provide regular updates to Claude" (p27)

[https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.42...]

But also they quite clearly have no idea how classified information systems work: air gapping is step 1 of that process, and no one from Anthropic would be working on those systems without a security clearance.